Workday has similar workforce analytics offerings, but they usually make the most sense if you are already committed to the Workday ecosystem, have the internal team to configure it, and are ready for a larger platform spend. A comparable enterprise path can mean multi-year commitments and costs that can reach hundreds of thousands per year. EIP starts at $25k, can begin immediately, uses the systems you already have, and adds the human operator layer that platform data alone misses.

The diagnostic begins with your Turnover Tax: the fully loaded cost of attrition across recruiting, training, productivity loss, overtime, quality, and customer impact. We identify at least $100,000 in recoverable value or you pay nothing, so the business case is anchored to dollars before any broader rollout is discussed.

No. EIP is designed to give HR stronger executive leverage, not blame. Turnover is usually a system issue involving labor markets, managers, scheduling, pay, onboarding, workload, career paths, and operating discipline. We translate that complexity into a shared executive plan HR can lead with confidence.

Engagement surveys tell you how people feel at a point in time. EIP connects sentiment to turnover patterns, manager behavior, location-level performance, role economics, and competitive pressure. The result is not another report. It is a prioritized recovery blueprint with owners, actions, and financial impact.

EIP is built for execution. The 30-day diagnostic identifies the money, the root causes, and the first moves. Implementation options add guided operating rhythms, dashboard updates, manager actions, and executive reviews so the work does not die in a slide deck.

Turnover compounds every pay period. Waiting means more hiring spend, lost productivity, frustrated managers, customer disruption, and avoidable exits. EIP is intentionally low-friction: no long commitment is required to start, and the first diagnostic can begin as soon as the right stakeholders and basic data are available.

That is exactly the failure pattern EIP is built to avoid. We translate findings into a short list of manager-level moves, executive owners, operating rhythms, and measurable checkpoints. The work is not positioned as an HR campaign. It becomes an operating discipline tied to cost, staffing stability, customer continuity, and leadership accountability.

That is normal. EIP does not require a perfect HRIS environment to get started. We can work from payroll exports, HRIS reports, ATS data, engagement results, location data, manager rosters, and interviews. The human layer is part of the model because the numbers rarely explain themselves.

The lift is designed to be contained. We need a small set of data, a few stakeholder conversations, and access to people who understand how work actually gets done. EIP handles the analysis, synthesis, and executive translation so your team gets a sharper plan without carrying the full build.

You can build pieces internally, but most teams get stuck translating analysis into executive action. EIP brings the model, the benchmarks, the operator interviews, the financial framing, and the implementation path. Your team keeps ownership, while EIP compresses months of trial-and-error into a focused diagnostic and recovery plan.

No. EIP looks for patterns in business conditions, workforce movement, manager practices, and employee experience. The goal is not to police individuals. The goal is to identify where the system is creating avoidable churn and give leaders practical changes that improve retention, trust, and performance.